America's Voice En Español »
Major anti-immigrant organizations such as the Center for Immigration Studies, NumbersUSA and the Federation for American Immigration Reform are closely aligned with the Republican Members of Congress who are now in charge of immigration policy for the U.S. House of Representatives. In a series of hearings, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith, Immigration Subcommittee Chair Elton Gallegly, and Immigration Subcommittee Vice-Chair Steve King are continuing their long history of blaming immigrants for issues from unemployment to pollution. To prove their case, they are calling key witnesses from within the anti-immigrant movement, disguising them as experts on the impact of immigration on U.S. workers.
As part of this effort to rebrand “mass deportation” in more popular terms, the anti-immigrant lobby has created a series of front groups, including Progressives for Immigration Reform (PFIR). These groups pretend to speak for the “silent majority” of workers, African Americans, Vietnamese Americans, or environmentalists – to name only a few examples – who oppose immigration reform and support a mass deportation agenda instead. But a closer look how these groups are organized and funded shows that they are entirely dependent on the anti-immigrant lobby, and represent nothing but the desire of its leaders and allies in Congress to make their mass deportation policies seem less extreme than they really are. 
The Coalition for the Future American Worker: The Pro-Worker Front Group without Any Employees
The Coalition for the Future American Worker (CFAW) is the “pro-worker” face of the hard-line anti-immigrant lobby. But like FAIR’s champions in Congress, who cast themselves as having the interests of American workers at the heart of their anti-immigrant agenda, the Coalition for the Future American Worker is not what it claims to be.
CFAW has no staff, no office and does not pay its own bills – it is simply a project of hard-line anti-immigrant groups, many of which have disturbing histories and ties. Its website is registered to FAIR staff  and Dan Stein, president of FAIR, Roy Beck of Numbers USA and Brantley Davis, partner in FAIR’s public relations firm, Davis & co. have served as spokespeople for CFAW.
No international unions are associated with the Coalition for the Future American Worker in any way. Only one local union, the Communications Workers of America Local 4250 is listed as a member of the coalition.
Unlike the grassroots, labor oriented persona that it seeks to project, most CFAW member organizations  are part of the anti-immigrant network created by noted white nationalist John Tanton.  The network includes organizations that have been designated as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center and which share ties with extremist organizations. These organizations have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars for advertising under the “Coalition for the Future American Worker” name, with the goal of preventing action on comprehensive immigration reform. Member organizations of CFAW include:
In 2004 and other years, CFAW spent an untold amount on advocacy advertising on television, directed at pro-labor candidates for office. One of their many ad campaigns, designed to damage the candidacy of then Congressman Martin Frost (D-TX), who received a lifetime grade of A from the AFL-CIO, was designed to benefit Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), who has a lifetime grade of F from the AFL-CIO. That same year, CFAW also sponsored ads to damage the candidacy of labor-supported candidates in Kansas and Iowa. Quickly after the ads began to run, Mark Smith, President of the Iowa Federation of Labor called them “just racist stuff with no factual basis.” The NBC affiliate in Des Moines, IA pulled the ads from broadcast and its general manager labeled them “borderline racist.” 
During the controversy, NumbersUSA director Roy Beck, then spokesman for CFAW said, “We don’t represent any union members in Iowa, but we do represent the interest of labor.”  As described below, Roy Beck and his colleagues in the anti-immigrant lobby have made a pattern of “representing” constituencies of which they are not a part.
A History of Co-Opting Mainstream Priorities to Promote a Hard-Line Agenda
The economy is just the latest “flavor of the month” excuse that members of the anti-immigrant lobby are using to promote their impractical agenda of mass deportation. These groups and their allied Members have embraced a variety of other important causes in their attempt to sell an extreme agenda to the mainstream.
Progressives. Progressives for Immigration Reform (PFIR)  was created in January 2009 by the anti-immigrant lobby to present a “progressive” face on the anti-immigrant lobby’s agenda. Roy Beck of Numbers USA helped to recruit its new director, Leah Durant, a former attorney for FAIR and its legal arm, the Immigration Reform Law Institute. Curiously, Durant’s tenure at FAIR is missing from her biography on the PFIR website. The vice president of PFIR is a board member for FAIR and the Center for Immigration Studies. Its blogger, Philip Cafaro, is an author for Mark Krikorian’s Center for Immigration Studies. 
Environmental movement. Similar to the model used to create the Coalition for the Future American Worker, FAIR other anti-immigrant organizations have created front groups such as “America’s Leadership Team for Long Range Population-Immigration-Resource Planning” and others to promote their hard-line anti-immigrant agenda. Leaders of the anti-immigrant movement even went so far as making a failed attempt to take over the Sierra Club board of directors in 2004  to force the club to adopt an anti-immigration platform. And in 2005, a ballot question to strike the Sierra Club’s longstanding policy  of not engaging on immigration was defeated by Sierra Club members 84 – 16 percent.  These failed takeover attempts are the vision of John Tanton himself who wrote in 1986, “The Sierra Club may not want to touch the immigration issue, but the immigration issue is going to touch the Sierra Club!” 
Latinos. FAIR’s Media Director, Ira Mehlman, is the contact person for FAIR’s “Latino” front group, “You Don’t Speak for Me.  The group’s handful of spokespeople have appeared on news programs as representative of a grassroots movement of Latinos, despite being wholly a project of FAIR, and despite public opinion research from a variety of sources that shows comprehensive immigration reform to be an important issue to Latino voters.
African-Americans. Choose Black America  was created by FAIR to advocate their anti-immigrant agenda with African American spokespeople and FAIR’s press secretary, , Bob Dane, served as the press contact for CBA.  Several of the African American spokespeople at their opening press conference acknowledged that they had never spoken to one another – one even immediately distanced himself from the group upon learning more about them.  While the CBA website, and therefore the organization, has been shut down, one of its spokespeople, Frank Morris, a board member for the Tanton founded Center for Immigration Studies later became a spokesperson for CFAW.
Vietnamese. Vietnamese for Fair Immigration (VIR)  was backed financially by FAIR and created by Tim Brummer under the Vietnamese pseudonym he created, “Tim Binh.” VIR sponsored high-priced billboard ads featuring Latinos saying “no racist amnesty,” which Brummer claims were paid for by the VIR membership. Brummer, aka Binh, is also a member of the Tanton-funded Californians for Population Stabilization. When it was revealed that “Binh” was actually Brummer, he said: “I speak Vietnamese, I eat Vietnamese food, I live with Vietnamese, in my mind, I’m half Vietnamese.” 
–excerpted from the America’s Voice report “The Anti-Worker Truth About the Republican House Judiciary Committee,” January 2011 
 The Nativist Lobby, Southern Poverty Law Center
 Statement of Principles, Council of Conservative Citizens
 Anti-Immigrant Groups, Southern Poverty Law Center
 The Spot – A Political Ad Blog. TNSMI/CMAG, 10/20/2009.
 Des Moines Register
 What is “Progressive” About Progressives for Immigration Reform, Center for New Community.
 A ‘hostile’ bid at the Sierra Club, Christian Science Monitor, 2/20/2004
 Environmental Organizations Targeted by Anti-Immigrant Bigots, Center for New Community
 Immigration group may not be what they seem, San Diego IndyMedia, 12/16/2006.
 Anti – Immigration Groups and the Masks of False Diversity, E Pluribus Media, 2/5/2007.
 Vietnamese Anti-Immigrant Group Really Isn’t, Southern Poverty Law Center
 The Anti-Worker Truth about the Republican House Judiciary Committee, America’s Voice Education Fund, January, 2011.